Skip to main content
Inspection outcome
Opened: May 30, 2025 · Closed: September 2, 2025
Citations issued

OSHA issued one or more Other-than-serious citations.

Safety inspection · Complaint · Partial — limited to specific operations or areas

Violations4
Serious+0
Initial penalty$28,170
Current penalty$16,902
Accidents0
Duration95d
Summary

What happened in this inspection

On May 30, 2025, OSHA opened The Pep Boys- Manny, Moe & Jack Llc’s inspection #348278094 at NORFOLK, Virginia — an establishment in the general automotive repair industry. The case was administratively closed on September 2, 2025, 95 days after opening.

OSHA cited the employer for 4 violations totaling $16,902 in current penalties — reduced from an initial proposed total of $28,170. All citations were Other-than-serious.

Breakdown by classification
4violations total
Serious250%

A Serious violation is one where there is substantial probability that death or serious physical harm could result, and the employer knew (or should have known) of the hazard. Maximum penalty is ~$16,550 per violation. The majority of OSHA citations fall into this category.

Other-than-serious250%

An Other-than-serious violation has a direct relationship to job safety and health but probably would not cause death or serious physical harm. Maximum penalty is ~$16,550 per violation. Often involves recordkeeping or procedural lapses.

Citations

Citations issued in this inspection

4citations issued
$16,902current penalty
↓ $11,268total reduction
Look up on OSHA.gov
Seriousgravity 5
Citation #01001A
16VAC25-60-120General Duty Clause or unstructured citation
Initial$9,390
Current$9,390
Seriousgravity 5
Citation #01001B
16VAC25-60-120General Duty Clause or unstructured citation
Initial$9,390
Current$0reduced by $9,390
Othergravity 5
Citation #01003
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(2)(iii)View full regulation text on OSHA.gov
Initial$9,390
Current$7,512reduced by $1,878
Othergravity 1
Citation #02001
29 CFR 1910.157(g)(1)View full regulation text on OSHA.gov
Initial$0
Current$0

Standard codes link to the regulation text on OSHA.gov. The text describes the rule itself; the specific findings of this inspection appear above. To see OSHA’s official record of this inspection, search activity number 348278094 at OSHA Establishment Search.

Reference

About OSHA inspections

The U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) conducts inspections under several triggers: programmed targeting of high-hazard industries, employee complaints, workplace accidents, fatalities, and follow-ups to prior citations.

📋
Citations

Each citation specifies a section of 29 CFR, a severity tier, and a proposed penalty. Employers can contest citations through OSHA’s informal conference or before the OSH Review Commission.

Open vs closed

An open case has not yet been administratively closed — citations may follow or the case may close without action.

💰
Current vs initial penalty

Initial penalty is the proposed amount at citation. Current penalty is the post-conference / settlement figure on file today.

🔗
Trigger types

A = Accident, B = Complaint, H = Programmed, F = Follow-up. See the glossary for all codes.

About this inspection

OSHA classified this as Complaint — an inspection triggered by a worker complaint.

Sources

Cross-check with OSHA directly

This page draws from the OSHA Integrated Management Information System (IMIS) via the DOL Open Data Portal. For the authoritative record, look up activity number 348278094 directly: