Othergravity 5
Citation #0100729 CFR 1910.151(c)View full regulation text on OSHA.govInitial$9,931
→
Current$0reduced by $9,931
OSHA Inspection
Mb Dynamics Inc. — OSHA Inspection #348006990
BEDFORD HEIGHTS, Ohio · NAICS 334519 · 25 workers on site
Inspection outcome
Opened: January 29, 2025 · Closed: March 16, 2026
○
Citations issued
OSHA issued one or more Other-than-serious citations.
Health inspection · Complaint · Partial — limited to specific operations or areas
Violations24
Serious+0
Initial penalty$89,371
Current penalty$18,536
Accidents0
Duration411d
Summary
What happened in this inspection
On January 29, 2025, OSHA opened Mb Dynamics Inc.’s inspection #348006990 at BEDFORD HEIGHTS, Ohio. The case was administratively closed on March 16, 2026, 411 days after opening.
OSHA cited the employer for 24 violations totaling $18,536 in current penalties — reduced from an initial proposed total of $89,371. All citations were Other-than-serious.
Breakdown by classification
24violations total
Serious1458%
A Serious violation is one where there is substantial probability that death or serious physical harm could result, and the employer knew (or should have known) of the hazard. Maximum penalty is ~$16,550 per violation. The majority of OSHA citations fall into this category.
Other-than-serious1042%
An Other-than-serious violation has a direct relationship to job safety and health but probably would not cause death or serious physical harm. Maximum penalty is ~$16,550 per violation. Often involves recordkeeping or procedural lapses.
Citations
Citations issued in this inspection
Seriousgravity 10
Citation #01006C29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2)View full regulation text on OSHA.govInitial$0
→
Current$0
Seriousgravity 10
Citation #01006D29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i)(a)View full regulation text on OSHA.govInitial$0
→
Current$0
Seriousgravity 10
Citation #01006E29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1)View full regulation text on OSHA.govInitial$0
→
Current$0
Seriousgravity 1
Citation #0100829 CFR 1910.212(a)(1)View full regulation text on OSHA.govInitial$4,965
→
Current$1,986reduced by $2,979
Seriousgravity 10
Citation #01009A29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8)View full regulation text on OSHA.govInitial$11,585
→
Current$4,634reduced by $6,951
Seriousgravity 10
Citation #01009B29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1)View full regulation text on OSHA.govInitial$11,585
→
Current$0reduced by $11,585
Other
Citation #0200129 CFR 1904.4(a)View full regulation text on OSHA.govInitial$1,655
→
Current$0reduced by $1,655
Other
Citation #0200229 CFR 1910.107(b)(5)(i)View full regulation text on OSHA.govInitial$0
→
Current$0
Other
Citation #0200329 CFR 1910.107(b)(9)View full regulation text on OSHA.govInitial$0
→
Current$0
Other
Citation #0200429 CFR 1910.107(e)(2)View full regulation text on OSHA.govInitial$0
→
Current$0
Other
Citation #0200529 CFR 1910.107(f)(4)View full regulation text on OSHA.govInitial$0
→
Current$0
Other
Citation #0200629 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii)View full regulation text on OSHA.govInitial$0
→
Current$0
Othergravity 5
Citation #0100129 CFR 1910.106(e)(2)(iv)(a)View full regulation text on OSHA.govInitial$6,620
→
Current$0reduced by $6,620
Othergravity 5
Citation #0100229 CFR 1910.106(e)(2)(iv)(c)View full regulation text on OSHA.govInitial$6,620
→
Current$0reduced by $6,620
Seriousgravity 5
Citation #0100329 CFR 1910.106(e)(9)(iii)View full regulation text on OSHA.govInitial$6,620
→
Current$2,648reduced by $3,972
Seriousgravity 5
Citation #01004A29 CFR 1910.107(c)(6)View full regulation text on OSHA.govInitial$6,620
→
Current$0reduced by $6,620
Othergravity 5
Citation #01004B29 CFR 1910.107(c)(7)View full regulation text on OSHA.govInitial$0
→
Current$0
Seriousgravity 10
Citation #01005A29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1)(i)View full regulation text on OSHA.govInitial$11,585
→
Current$4,634reduced by $6,951
Seriousgravity 10
Citation #01005B29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2)View full regulation text on OSHA.govInitial$0
→
Current$0
Seriousgravity 10
Citation #01005C29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1)View full regulation text on OSHA.govInitial$0
→
Current$0
Seriousgravity 10
Citation #01005D29 CFR 1910.138(a)View full regulation text on OSHA.govInitial$0
→
Current$0
Seriousgravity 10
Citation #01006A29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)View full regulation text on OSHA.govInitial$11,585
→
Current$4,634reduced by $6,951
Seriousgravity 5
Citation #01006B29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1)View full regulation text on OSHA.govInitial$0
→
Current$0
Standard codes link to the regulation text on OSHA.gov. The text describes the rule itself; the specific findings of this inspection appear above. To see OSHA’s official record of this inspection, search activity number 348006990 at OSHA Establishment Search.
Reference
About OSHA inspections
The U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) conducts inspections under several triggers: programmed targeting of high-hazard industries, employee complaints, workplace accidents, fatalities, and follow-ups to prior citations.
Citations
Each citation specifies a section of 29 CFR, a severity tier, and a proposed penalty. Employers can contest citations through OSHA’s informal conference or before the OSH Review Commission.
Open vs closed
An open case has not yet been administratively closed — citations may follow or the case may close without action.
Current vs initial penalty
Initial penalty is the proposed amount at citation. Current penalty is the post-conference / settlement figure on file today.
Trigger types
A = Accident, B = Complaint, H = Programmed, F = Follow-up. See the glossary for all codes.
About this inspection
OSHA classified this as Complaint — an inspection triggered by a worker complaint.
Sources
Cross-check with OSHA directly
This page draws from the OSHA Integrated Management Information System (IMIS) via the DOL Open Data Portal. For the authoritative record, look up activity number 348006990 directly:
From the blog
Understand OSHA enforcement
Guides and analysis from our editorial team.
Data report
Industries With the Most OSHA Violations on Record (2026)
NAICS industries ranked by total OSHA citations and total inspections in the current enforcement window. Construction and specialty trades dominate both leaderboards.
Data report
The 15 U.S. Cities With the Most OSHA Inspections (2026)
A city-by-city ranking of U.S. metros with the highest OSHA inspection counts in the current enforcement window — what the city-level data reveals about regional safety enforcement.
Data report
OSHA Enforcement in 2026, By the Numbers: 426,000 Employers on Record
An overview of OSHA enforcement activity across 426,760 U.S. employers — 575,985 inspections, 24,000 violations, and $62,581,468 in penalties currently on file.
Data report
Seattle vs. Portland: OSHA Enforcement in Two Pacific Northwest Cities Compared
A side-by-side comparison of OSHA enforcement activity in Seattle and Portland — inspection counts, violations, penalties, and what the data reveals about workplace safety in each city.
Data report
The 10 U.S. Employers With the Largest OSHA Penalties on Record (2026)
A ranked list of the ten U.S. employers carrying the highest cumulative OSHA penalty assessments in the current enforcement window, with links to their full inspection histories.
Data report
The 10 Most-Inspected U.S. Employers in OSHA Records (2026)
Ten U.S. employers with the highest OSHA inspection counts across the current five-year enforcement window, ranked with links to each company's full record.
Data report
Top 10 Alabama Employers by OSHA Inspections (2026)
The ten Alabama employers with the most OSHA inspections on record in the current enforcement window — with violation counts, penalty totals, and links to each full inspection record.
Data report
Top 10 Alaska Employers by OSHA Inspections (2026)
The ten Alaska employers with the most OSHA inspections on record in the current enforcement window — with violation counts, penalty totals, and links to each full inspection record.
Data report
Top 10 Arizona Employers by OSHA Inspections (2026)
The ten Arizona employers with the most OSHA inspections on record in the current enforcement window — with violation counts, penalty totals, and links to each full inspection record.