Skip to main content
Safety scorecard
Years On File: 2015–2025
A
Safety grade
Strong record
Score: 100/100
Years11
Inspections27
Violations8
Serious+0
Penalties$6,377
Summary

Safety record at a glance

U.s.postal Service is a New Mexico-based employer with 27 OSHA inspections on file (covering 2015-2025). Across those inspections, OSHA cited 8 violations, with a total of $6,377 in federal penalties assessed.

Inspection & violation trend

Year-by-year activity, citations issued, and reported workplace incidents.

27Inspections
8Violations
Inspections openedViolations citedSerious / Repeat / WillfulAccidents / injuries reported

Hover any year for detail. Counts reflect inspections, citations, and accidents on file at OSHA — final dispositions and amounts may change after appeals or settlement.

Inspection history

All OSHA inspections at U.s.postal Service

8 inspections with citations, 19 closed clean or still open. Click any inspection for the full citation list.

No violations or still open — 19
No violationsOct 15, 2024
Health inspection#347827883
Closed Jan 31 — no citations.
No violationsOct 15, 2024
Health inspection#347827909
Closed Nov 25 — no citations.
No violationsJul 14, 2022
Safety inspection#346081144
Closed Jul 18 — no citations.
No violationsJul 28, 2021
Safety inspection#345456081
Closed Jan 14 — no citations.
No violationsAug 19, 2019
Health inspection#344248687
Closed Sep 18 — no citations.
No violationsOct 3, 2018
Health inspection#343513677
Closed Nov 20 — no citations.
No violationsSep 24, 2018
Safety inspection#343494860
Closed Nov 20 — no citations.
No violationsNov 6, 2017
Health inspection#342754900
Closed Jan 10 — no citations.
No violationsJul 27, 2017
Safety inspection#342503786
Closed Nov 2 — no citations.
No violationsJun 26, 2017
Safety inspection#342432887
Closed Nov 28 — no citations.
No violationsAug 1, 2016
Safety inspection#341668523
Closed Nov 30 — no citations.
No violationsMay 12, 2016
Safety inspection#341474708
Closed Jul 18 — no citations.
No violationsApr 28, 2016
Health inspection#341443299
Closed Aug 10 — no citations.
No violationsApr 11, 2016
Health inspection#341397206
Closed Jun 30 — no citations.
No violationsMar 14, 2016
Safety inspection#341320331
Closed May 18 — no citations.
No violationsFeb 8, 2016
Safety inspection#341251155
Closed Feb 26 — no citations.
No violationsOct 19, 2015
Safety inspection#341004554
Closed Jan 19 — no citations.
No violationsMar 27, 2015
Health inspection#340499334
Closed Jun 3 — no citations.
No violationsJan 26, 2015
Safety inspection#340208248
Closed Apr 9 — no citations.
Industry peers

Similar employers in New Mexico

Other employers with comparable industry classification or location.

All in this industry →
Methodology

How to read this record

An OSHA inspection record describes federal enforcement activity — it does not capture every workplace safety event at a company. A few caveats:

📅
5-year window

OSHA Violations Tracker indexes inspections opened on or after 2021-01-01. Older history is at OSHA’s establishment search.

🏢
Establishment vs. company

OSHA records are keyed by physical establishment, not parent company. A large employer may operate many sites across states.

Inspection without citation is normal

Many inspections close with no violations — that’s a positive signal, not a missing data row.

💰
Penalties are current assessment

Final amounts may differ after informal conferences or settlement. We show what OSHA has on file today.

Full methodology, scoring details, and known limitations: /methodology.

Frequently asked questions about U.s.postal Service

U.s.postal Service earned a A safety grade (100/100) — strong record. The grade reflects severity of past citations, accident history, and how recent the most-recent inspection is. See the methodology for the full scoring algorithm.

Sources

Cross-check with OSHA directly

All data on this page comes from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data Portal, which publishes the OSHA Integrated Management Information System (IMIS). For the authoritative record, search OSHA directly: